Employment Law Banner - Anderson Legal

Need Advice About Workplace Discrimination?

You are in the right place.

Workplace Discrimination

Employment Law

Are you dealing with workplace discrimination and not sure where to begin? Here is a good starting place.


Specific Issues

On-Demand Resources

View on-demand information about specific issues related to workplace discrimination in Australia.


If you face workplace discrimination issues, get advice from Anderson Legal with a fixed-price initial consultation.



This firm safeguards what matters most and acts purposefully in times of crisis. It acts for employers, executives, and employees.

Having successfully represented litigants in the High Court of Australia, Royal Commissions, Fair Work Commission and multiple other courts and tribunals, Andrew Anderson has a demonstrated record of success in complex and difficult cases.

As a boutique law firm, Anderson Legal is dedicated to providing expert advice and representation in dealing with workplace issues. Although based in Brisbane, this firm advises clients nationally.

Andrew Anderson, Legal Director, is an experienced lawyer who has been independently described by the Courier Mail as “one of the best legal minds” and a “leading corporate and white-collar crime lawyer” (16 December 2021)

Andrew Anderson - Lawyer

Workplace Discrimination

If you have searched “discrimination lawyer” or for an “employment lawyer“, you will see there are many options available. Why choose Anderson Legal?

If you seek an experienced lawyer to help you in dealing with discrimination claims at work, Andrew Anderson has a proven track record of successfully guiding his clients through challenging, complex and serious problems.

The areas of law Anderson Legal handles are narrow yet deep. It ensures this firm can handle all cases to the highest standards, no matter the complexity.

Personalised Solutions

Anderson Legal takes the time to understand the circumstances and priorities of each of its clients and tailors solutions accordingly.

Many people attach their identity to their employment or profession and discrimination claims can significantly impact reputations and livelihoods.

Resolving workplace issues is not always straightforward, as other issues often affect decisions – reputational risks, financial realities, and opportunity costs.

This firm offers tailored strategies to resolve workplace concerns.

Workplace Bullying Lawyer - Anderson Legal

What is workplace discrimination?

Discrimination under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

Unlawful workplace discrimination occurs when an employer takes ‘adverse action’ against an employee or prospective employee because of a personal attribute that is protected from discrimination:

  • race
  • colour
  • sex
  • sexual preference
  • age
  • physical or mental disability
  • marital status
  • family or carer’s responsibilities
  • pregnancy
  • religion
  • political opinion
  • national extraction or social origin

These ‘general protections’ from workplace discrimination are set out in section 351 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), which relevantly states:

Discrimination

(1) An employer must not take adverse action against a person who is an employee, or prospective employee, of the employer because of the person’s race, colour, sex, sexual preference, age, physical or mental disability, marital status, family or carer’s responsibilities, pregnancy, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin.

Note: This subsection is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4‑1).

(2) However, subsection (1) does not apply to action that is:

(a) not unlawful under any anti‑discrimination law in force in the place where the action is taken; or

(b) taken because of the inherent requirements of the particular position concerned; or

(c) if the action is taken against a staff member of an institution conducted in accordance with the doctrines, tenets, beliefs or teachings of a particular religion or creed–taken:

(i) in good faith; and

(ii) to avoid injury to the religious susceptibilities of adherents of that religion or creed.

The fact this law is a ‘civil-remedy provision’ means that corporations and individuals are liable to court-imposed fines for breaching the law, as well as other orders such as injunctions to stop discriminatory conduct, reinstatement or compensation orders for those affected.

Other anti-discrimination laws

The Commonwealth government has a number of anti-discrimination laws that operate across Australia:

  • Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth)
  • Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth)
  • Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth)
  • Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth)

State and territory governments also have anti-discrimination laws that can apply to discrimination that occurs in a workplace context:

  • Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
  • Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA)
  • Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (SA)
  • Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (QLD)
  • Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT)
  • Anti-Discrimination Act 1992 (NT)
  • Equal Opportunity Act 1995 (VIC)
  • Anti-Discrimination Act 1998 (TAS)

Anti-discrimination laws may be breached by discriminatory conduct in a workplace, even if it does not constitute ‘adverse action’ under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). As such, a person who suffers discrimination may also seek redress in a human rights or anti-discrimination commission, such as the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) or Queensland Human Rights Commission (QHRC).

Examples of unlawful discrimination

The term ‘adverse action’ is defined in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and includes an employer discriminating against an employee by:

  • dismissing an employee;
  • injuring an employee in his or her employment;
  • altering the position of the employee to the employee’s prejudice; or,
  • discriminating between the employee and other employees.

The following three examples of unlawful workplace discrimination and the financial consequences that can result are based on the concepts of ‘discrimination’ and ‘adverse action’ under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth):

  • Discriminatory action based on pregnancy resulted in a $61,000 pecuniary penalty order against an employer, as well as compensation of $164,097 for loss suffered and $10,000 for distress, hurt and humiliation (Sagona v R & C Piccoli Investments Pty Ltd & Ors [2014] FCCA 875).
  • Dismissing an employee who was “always sick” resulted in a $16,500 pecuniary penalty against the employer, as it was found to constitute disability discrimination (Pavolvich v Atlantic Contractors Pty Ltd [2012] FMCA 1080).
  • Dismissing an employee who took carer’s leave to take his daughter to a doctor resulted in a $10,000 pecuniary penalty against the employer, as well as a $10,000 compensation order, as it was found to be discrimination based on family or carer’s responsibilities (Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Atkins [2014] FCCA 1553).

The above examples of unlawful workplace discrimination show the seriousness of employers acting contrary to the general protections of employees.

Who can be liable for discrimination?

Unlawful workplace discrimination under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) covers most employers, employees, independent contractors, people who have entered into a contract for services with an independent contractor, and industrial associations. It also includes prospective employers, prospective employees, and people proposing to enter into a contract for services with an independent contractor.

This means that it is not just employers who can face discrimination claims for adverse action under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), employees can also be liable for discriminatory acts against their employer in certain circumstances. Other anti-discrimination laws in Australia extend liability to companies and individuals in ways that are broader than unlawful workplace discrimination under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Contesting unfair discrimination claims

When a person makes a general protections claim as a result of unlawful workplace discrimination under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), it is presumed that the respondent took the action for the discriminatory reason or intent alleged unless the respondent proves otherwise. The rebuttable presumption is set out in section 361 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth):

Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise

(1) If:

(a) in an application in relation to a contravention of this Part, it is alleged that a person took, or is taking, action for a particular reason or with a particular intent; and

(b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;

it is presumed that the action was, or is being, taken for that reason or with that intent, unless the person proves otherwise.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to orders for an interim injunction.

So, for example, if it is alleged by an employee that they were dismissed because they were pregnant, once the employee establishes that they were (1) dismissed, and (2) pregnant at the time, it is presumed the employer dismissed the employee for the reason alleged unless the employer proves otherwise. An employer may prove the dismissal was motivated by a valid reason by producing evidence, such as letters, notes, or other records.

While the rebuttable presumption may be thought to make it ‘easier’ for someone to make an allegation of unlawful workplace discrimination, the reality is it is the person who makes the decision (e.g. an employer who dismisses an employee) ought to have the knowledge as to why they took the action they did and are in the best position to produce evidence of it. It does mean that contesting unfair discrimination claims can be more burdensome for respondents than other types of claims because it is not only the applicant that may have to ‘prove’ facts.

What rights exist for respondents?

People do not always want to file a complaint with an anti-discrimination commission, human rights agency, or a court or tribunal. In some cases, complaints are raised as a grievance in the workplace, which may prompt a workplace investigation or disciplinary process.

The rights that exist for respondents to allegations of workplace discrimination may be influenced by industrial awards, enterprise agreements, employment contracts, as well as workplace policies and procedures. Responses may also be influenced or managed by professional or regulatory bodies. In the context of workplace investigations that may follow a grievance about alleged discrimination, respondents typically have rights relating to the following:

  • procedural fairness
  • reasonable accommodations
  • employee support
  • health and safety rights
  • self-incrimination privilege
  • confidentiality considerations

People may ask, what does an unfair investigation or disciplinary process look like ? Common concerns include:

  • Bias or perceived bias from the investigator / decision-maker;
  • Conflicts of interest between participants and the investigator / decision-maker;
  • Failure to follow relevant policies, procedures and industrial instruments;
  • Vague, unclear and unparticularised allegations;
  • Changes to the allegations or investigation without explanation;
  • Lack of transparency regarding the evidence gathered;
  • Failure to disclose the workplace investigation report;
  • Failure to give adequate notice before responses are required;
  • Directions to not communicate with potential witnesses;
  • Denial of access to a support person;
  • Delays in progressing or finalising the investigation; and,
  • Omission to investigate issues raised by a respondent.

If you are dealing with an allegation of discriminatory conduct and seek to obtain legal advice, contact Anderson Legal for a fixed-price initial consultation to get personalised advice about your situation.

Specific Issues: Workplace Discrimination

Show cause letters for discrimination

Show cause letters for discrimination

Understanding the options available when responding to a show cause letter concerning discrimination claims is critical.
Responding to unfair discrimination claims

Unfairly accused of discrimination

Getting informed advice is always important in relation to discrimination issues, and is all the more important for unfair or vexatious claims.
Unfair Workplace Investigations

Unfair workplace investigations

Employers may face legal action for the harm or damage caused through inadequate or unfair workplace investigations.
Discrimination Investigations

Investigations into workplace discrimination

If you are required to respond to a discrimination claim that you consider to be unfair, misconceived, or false, getting informed about your options is essential to protecting your rights and advancing your interests.
Getting informed advice is always important in relation to discrimination issues, and is all the more important for unfair or vexatious claims.
Free Consultation

Anderson Legal offers a fixed-priced initial consultation to businesses, executives, and employees dealing with discrimination issues.

Who this firm assists

Anderson Legal has a focus on resolving workplace problems. It provides advice and legal services to:

  • small business operators
  • executives in medium to large enterprises
  • employees in medium to large enterprises
  • public service employees

The potential impact of workplace discrimination claims on reputations, relationships, and livelihoods makes it critical to have an employment lawyer who is equal to the task. If you need an employment lawyer, there are many reasons why Anderson Legal should be your preferred choice:

  • Andrew Anderson, Legal Director, is an experienced lawyer who has been independently described by the Courier Mail as “one of the best legal minds” and a “leading corporate and white-collar crime lawyer” (16 December 2021).
  • Having successfully represented litigants in the High Court of Australia, Royal Commissions, Fair Work Commission, and multiple other courts and tribunals, Andrew Anderson has a demonstrated record of success in complex and difficult cases.
  • Prior to operating a law firm, Andrew Anderson worked as a Principal Crown Prosecutor in Queensland and barrister in practice at 8 Petrie Terrace Chambers. His depth of courtroom experience ranges from straightforward claims right through to complex trials and appeals.
  • Anderson Legal is a law firm that is dedicated to the best ideals of the legal profession. Seeking to exceed client expectations and working for just outcomes is an everyday pursuit.

Read below how this firm can assist you, what it costs to get advice, and when to contact this firm.

How this firm can assist

With respect to workplace discrimination claims, this firm assists its clients in navigating all kinds of issues, including:

  • advising on whether certain conduct may be classified as ‘discrimination’
  • assisting with workplace investigations related to discrimination claims
  • negotiating resolutions with respect to workplace discrimination allegations
  • detailing internal complaint processes and resolution possibilities
  • outlining the potential risks faced by a person facing discrimination claims, such as:
    • anti-discrimination litigation
    • professional conduct referrals
    • regulatory agency referrals
    • civil litigation claims
  • representing clients litigating workplace discrimination claims in courts and tribunals

Note: Anderson Legal does not provide advice or representation for compensation claims under personal injury or workers’ compensation laws.

What it costs to get advice

Fixed price initial consultation

Fixed-Price Consultation
One-Hour Consultation
Confidential
No-Obligation Consultation

A fixed-price initial consultation is $495 incl. GST for up to one hour, which may be tax deductible (consult your tax advisor).

If you are dealing with a workplace discrimination issue, book an appointment for an initial consultation with Anderson Legal. It is designed to deliver clear and timely advice that allows you to understand the relevant legal issues and make informed choices about the action that may be taken.

The time is devoted to ensuring an understanding of the particular issues to allow advice to be given based on the information you provide, which may include:

  • The legal framework for workplace discrimination:
    • Employer rights and responsibilities
    • Employee rights and responsibilities
    • Is it ‘discrimination’?
    • Specific procedures adopted by the workplace
  • Outline of possible disciplinary outcomes
  • Discrimination claim response options:
    • Dealing with internal complaints
    • Responding to workplace investigations
    • Contesting allegations and findings
    • Preparing for disciplinary meetings
    • Possible referrals to external bodies
    • End of contract negotiations
  • Specific issues with discrimination claims
    • Discrimination complaint avenues
    • Alternative resolution processes
    • Victimisation and reprisal action
    • Public servants accused of discrimination
    • Executives accused of discrimination

An initial consultation with Anderson Legal is obligation-free, meaning there is no expectation or commitment to further legal work or costs. If you want to engage this firm to provide you with further advice or legal representation, estimates of costs will be provided as far as possible.

Initial consultations are by appointment only, with in-person, video, and phone options possible.

Representation for workplace discrimination claims

Anderson Legal is transparent about how it charges legal fees.

This firm generally charges on a capped-fee, fixed-fee, or time-costed basis. How you are charged is something that may be negotiated and your preferences are taken into consideration.

Please note that Anderson Legal does not undertake legal work on a ‘no-win, no-fee’ basis.

In representing businesses, executives, and employees with workplace discrimination claims, Anderson Legal puts in place a formal costs agreement with all clients. This includes a disclosure statement outlining important rights, as well as quotes or estimates for applicable legal fees.

When to contact this firm

Employment law issues can have strict timeframes, so it is prudent to seek legal advice as soon as possible for employment law concerns.

Workplace discrimination can involve many legal complexities, which can have profound consequences for reputations, relationships, and livelihoods. It is the reason why it can be critical for business operators, executives and, employees to get urgent legal advice when dealing with such issues.

If you want legal advice, you should call Anderson Legal to set up an appointment for a fixed-price initial consultation: