Manslaughter Charges - Queensland


Sections 300 and 303 Criminal Code (Qld)

Get informed about the law, defences, and penalties in Queensland

Manslaughter is among the most serious criminal offences in Queensland. In Queensland, punishment for manslaughter carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. In Queensland, an unlawful killing that does not meet the definition of murder may be deemed manslaughter under section 303 of the Criminal Code (Qld).

Legal Disclaimer

Page Contents

Manslaughter Charges

Anderson Legal defends individuals facing criminal allegations relating to violent offences and misconduct.

On-Demand Resources

View our growing library of articles and webinars, which are accessible no matter the time of day or night.

Free Consultation

Anderson Legal provides a free, no-obligation consultation to understand whether this firm can assist you.

Manslaughter Charges

Anderson Legal defends individuals facing criminal allegations relating to violent offences and misconduct.

On-Demand Resources

View our growing library of articles and webinars, which are accessible no matter the time of day or night.

Free Consultation

Anderson Legal provides a free, no-obligation consultation to understand whether this firm can assist you.

Manslaughter Charges

Before you can properly defend yourself against an allegation of any kind, you need to understand it.
This section deals with the following:
Criminal Defence Image

Manslaughter Charges

Before you can properly defend yourself against an allegation of any kind, you need to understand it.
This section deals with the following:
Criminal Defence Image

Queensland Law

Section 300 Criminal Code (Qld)

Section 300 of the Criminal Code makes unlawful killing an offence in Queensland. The law states:

Any person who unlawfully kills another is guilty of a crime, which is called murder or manslaughter, according to the circumstances of the case.

From this section of the Criminal Code, definitions are then given for ‘murder‘ and ‘manslaughter’.

Definition of Manslaughter

Section 303 of the Criminal Code (Qld) sets out the definition of manslaughter. It states:

303 Definition of manslaughter

(1) A person who unlawfully kills another under such circumstances as not to constitute murder is guilty of manslaughter.

(2) An indictment charging an offence against this section with the circumstance of aggravation stated in the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992, section 161Q may not be presented without the consent of a Crown Law Officer.

Section 161Q of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 refers to the ‘serious organised crime circumstance of aggravation’, which mandates a significant mandatory minimum imprisonment in addition to any other penalty. It targets people who commit an offence of manslaughter in association with being a criminal organisation participant.

Proof of Manslaughter

For every criminal charge in Queensland, there are ‘elements’ that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Failure to prove just one element means the person charged must be found not guilty. Sometimes there will be an alternative offence that a person may then be found guilty of instead if proof of the primary charge fails.

There are different ways elements may be expressed, depending on the issues in a given case. For example, in a given case, manslaughter may be proved by criminal negligence, whereas in other cases a death may be caused by a deliberate act. In all cases, for a person to be convicted of manslaughter it is necessary for the prosecution to prove:

  • The deceased alleged to be killed is dead;
  • The person charged caused the death; and,
  • The person charged did so unlawfully.

For the purposes of the criminal law in Queensland, the definition of ‘killing’ is set out in section 293 of the Criminal Code (Qld):

293 Definition of killing

Except as hereinafter set forth, any person who causes the death of another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatever, is deemed to have killed that other person

As a result of section 293 of the Criminal Code (Qld), it is unnecessary for the prosecution to prove that the defendant’s actions were the sole cause of death, or that it immediately result. The way causation is understood in Queensland draws on the case of Royall v The Queen [1991] HCA 27, a decision of the High Court of Australia. How it applies in Queensland was explained by the Queensland Court of Appeal in R v Sherrington & Kuchler [2001] QCA 105, where it was said at paragraph [4]:

Under s 300 of the Criminal Code, any person who unlawfully kills another is guilty of a crime, “which is called murder or manslaughter, according to the circumstances”. By s 293 of the Code, a person is deemed to have killed another if he “causes the death of” that other directly or indirectly by any means whatever. In the application of that section, courts in Queensland follow the decision in Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378, 411, that a person causes the death of another if his act or conduct is a substantial or significant cause of death, or substantially contributed to the death (172 CLR 378, 398, 423). See Lowrie & Ross (1999) 106 A Crim R 565, 570-571. As was said in Royall, that question is not a philosophical or scientific one, but a question to be determined by the jury applying their common sense to the facts as they find them, at the same time appreciating that the purpose of the inquiry is to attribute legal responsibility in a criminal matter: Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378, 387, 425, 441.

The word ‘unlawfully’ means that the act or omission of the defendant causing the death is contrary to law and is not otherwise authorised, justified or excused. An example of when a person does not act unlawfully is when they act in self-defence.

In cases where multiple defendants are charged, Queensland law makes it possible for more than one person to be found guilty for the commission of an offence. For instance, a person may be found guilty if they aided or encouraged another person to do the act that causes death.

In reviewing an individual case, a criminal lawyer’s work often begins with a careful analysis of the evidence to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the prosecution case and, in particular, its ability to prove each element of the offence.

Possible Defences

The ‘presumption of innocence’

When people think about a ‘defence’ to a charge, such as manslaughter, they are generally thinking about what makes them ‘not guilty’ of the offence. However, it is for the prosecution to prove they are guilty – and to do so beyond a reasonable doubt. The presumption of innocence means that the defendant carries no onus of proof. What that means in practical terms is that it is for the prosecution to disprove any defences raised on the evidence.

For a charge of manslaughter, the prosecution must prove the elements of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. However, it must also exclude all defences that may apply beyond reasonable doubt. Of course, a defendant may give or call evidence that points to their innocence. The decision to give or call evidence does not shift the onus of proof away from the prosecution.

How are defences raised on the evidence?

A defence may be raised on the evidence of both the prosecution and the defence. That is, people who give witness statements to police may indicate that an event occurred accidentally, or a person appeared to act in self-defence. Generally speaking, the prosecution has an obligation to call all material witnesses at a trial – even those unfavourable to its case. Alternatively, a person charged with an offence may also call their own witnesses at a trial, which may provide the basis for a defence to be raised.

One of the important roles of a criminal lawyer is to identify, as early as possible, the relevant defences that may apply in a given case. The reason it is important to do it as early as possible is to ensure relevant witnesses are found while matters are freshest in their mind, or to prevent other evidence from being lost or destroyed.

Common defences for ‘manslaughter’

The law requires the prosecution to prove that the manslaughter was caused ‘unlawfully’. That means if the prosecution cannot disprove the act or omission is not excused by law, the person charged must be found not guilty. In Queensland, possible defences include:

  • Accident
  • Compulsion
  • Defence of another
  • Extraordinary emergency
  • Insanity
  • Mistake of fact
  • Self defence
  • Unwilled act

Amongst the most important advice a lawyer can provide is whether or not a defence applies to an individual case. In some cases, multiple defences may apply. In others, no defence may be considered viable. Certain defences cannot operate together. For this reason, anybody facing a charge of manslaughter should seek early, authoritative advice from an experienced criminal lawyer to understand their legal position.

Excluded defences for ‘manslaughter’

In Queensland, the same defences do not apply to every offence. Certain defences are qualified or excluded based on the elements that may apply. For example, manslaughter does not require proof that an ‘assault’ occurred. For that reason, ‘provocation’ is not a defence to a charge of manslaughter because the defence of provocation under section 269 of the Criminal Code applies only to offences where ‘assault’ is an element.

In cases where criminal negligence is the basis for manslaughter, the defences of ‘unwilled act’ and ‘accident’ under section 23 of the Criminal Code (Qld) will not apply. That is because the commencing words of section 23 are “Subject to the express provisions of this Code relating to negligent acts and omissions”. This makes the defences subject to the duties held by people to prevent death or harm resulting to people through criminal negligence. Under the Criminal Code in Queensland, criminal negligence cases may be based on deaths caused as a result of failing one of the following duties:

  • Duty to provide the necessaries of life to people who are unable to care for themselves due to age, sickness, unsoundness of mind, detention, or some other cause (see section 285 of the Criminal Code (Qld));
  • Duty of people who have care of children under 16 (see section 286 of the Criminal Code (Qld));
  • Duty of people doing dangerous acts (see section 288 of the Criminal Code (Qld));
  • Duty of persons in charge of dangerous things (see section 289 of the Criminal Code (Qld); and,
  • Duty to do certain acts (see section 290 of the Criminal Code (Qld).

The offence of industrial manslaughter is also based on the concept of negligence and the failure to take reasonable precautions in relation to the health, safety and welfare of workers.

Possible Penalties

Maximum Penalty

Under section 310 of the Criminal Code (Qld), the maximum penalty for manslaughter in Queensland is life imprisonment.

Minimum Penalty

Generally, there is no minimum penalty that applies to a charge of manslaughter. However, if a person is convicted of manslaughter and the circumstance of aggravation that the offence was committed as a criminal organisation participant, then the following minimum penalty applies:

  • When a person is convicted of committing the offence and the serious organised crime circumstance of aggravation applies, 7 years imprisonment is automatically imposed cumulatively on the sentence the court decides. The 7 years imprisonment must be served wholly in prison, on top of whatever other penalty is otherwise required to be served.

Sentencing in Queensland

For a charge of manslaughter, the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) sets out a range of relevant sentencing considerations, including that the principle that imprisonment should be imposed as a last resort does not apply. For a homicide offence like manslaughter, the law states that the court must have primary regard to the following considerations:

  • the risk of physical harm to any members of the community if a custodial sentence were not imposed;
  • the need to protect any members of the community from that risk;
  • the personal circumstances of any victim of the offence;
  • the circumstances of the offence, including the death of or any injury to a member of the public or any loss or damage resulting from the offence;
  • the nature or extent of the violence used, or intended to be used, in the commission of the offence;
  • any disregard by the offender for the interests of public safety;
  • the past record of the offender, including any attempted rehabilitation and the number of previous offences of any type committed;
  • the antecedents, age and character of the offender;
  • any remorse or lack of remorse of the offender;
  • any medical, psychiatric, prison or other relevant report in relation to the offender;
  • anything else about the safety of members of the community that the sentencing court considers relevant.

If the offence is classified as a ‘domestic violence offence’, then the court will treat that as an aggravating factor unless exceptional circumstances are shown. Due to the number of issues that can aggravate or mitigate the punishment imposed by a court, experience shows that the earlier a person facing a charge obtains sound advice from an experienced lawyer, the better their chance of securing the best outcome possible for their situation.

Possible Outcomes

Given the offence of manslaughter may be committed in an infinite number of ways, and those who do so come from all different backgrounds and stages of life, the possible punishment is similarly broad. As Chief Justice de Jersey summarised in the case of R v WAW [2013] QCA 22 at paragraph [32]:

The court has repeatedly emphasized the wide “range” applicable to sentencing for manslaughter, because of the infinitely varying circumstances in which that offence is committed.

In Queensland, a person convicted of manslaughter may have their offence declared a ‘serious violent offence’ under Part 9A of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld). The effect of an offence being declared a ‘serious violent offence’ is the offender must serve at least 80% of their term of imprisonment before they are eligible for release.

There are many offences under Queensland law that may have such declarations made, including:

The full list of applicable offences is contained in Schedule 1 of the Penalties and Sentences Act.

The declaration is automatic when a person is convicted of a prescribed offence and sentenced to at least 10 years’ imprisonment.

A court has the discretion to declare an offence a ‘serious violent offence’ if imposing between 5 and 10 years’ imprisonment for a charge of manslaughter.

Generally, courts have an unfettered discretion in determining whether to declare an offence a serious violent offence. However, in any case involving violence to a child under 12 or a crime that results in the death of a child under 12 years, the law requires a sentencing court to treat the age of the child as an aggravating factor in deciding whether to declare the offender to be convicted of a serious violent offence.

In some cases, a charge relating to manslaughter may be substituted for, or charged in addition to, other homicide offences. The prosecution may determine that a more or less serious charge may be appropriate, based on the evidence. Related crimes include:

Expert Criminal Defence

Although based in Brisbane, Anderson Legal is frequently engaged to defend people facing criminal allegations across Queensland. Anybody facing a manslaughter charge should obtain authoritative advice and guidance from a leading criminal lawyer. Anderson Legal offers comprehensive criminal defence services for its clients. This includes:

  • providing advice relating to allegations made or documents served on our clients;
  • identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the case alleged against our clients;
  • advising clients on options relating to obtaining evidence, including expert evidence;
  • communicating on behalf of its clients with police, courts, and others;
  • resolving, where appropriate, criminal charges through negotiation;
  • representing clients in trials and sentences before all courts; and,
  • filing and litigating appeals against wrongful convictions and unjust sentences.

This firm places an emphasis on providing clear guidance so that our clients are placed in a real position to make informed decisions about their options and their preferred path forward. Anderson Legal provides clear, transparent disclosure of its legal costs at every stage.

  • Andrew Anderson, Legal Director, is an award-winning lawyer who has been independently described by the Courier Mail as “one of the best legal minds” and a “leading corporate and white-collar crime lawyer” (16 December 2021).
  • Having successfully represented litigants in the High Court of Australia, Queensland Court of Appeal, Royal Commissions, and multiple other courts dealing with trials and other hearings, Andrew Anderson has a demonstrated record of success in complex and difficult cases.
  • Prior to operating a law firm, Andrew Anderson worked as a Principal Crown Prosecutor in Queensland and barrister in private practice at 8 Petrie Terrace Chambers in Brisbane. His depth of courtroom advocacy experience ranges from straightforward cases right through to complex homicide trials and appeals.
  • Anderson Legal is a law firm that is dedicated to the best ideals of the legal profession. Seeking to exceed client expectations and fighting for justice is an everyday pursuit.

Limitations on general information

Each legal issue is unique. The information on this page and website cannot – and is not meant to – substitute legal consultation. It is designed to outline information of a general nature if you want to learn more about manslaughter charges, particularly as it relates to anybody facing an issue of this kind in Queensland. Anybody dealing with a manslaughter charge ought to obtain expert legal advice and guidance as soon as possible.

No content accessible on the website is created to provide specific legal answers or advice. It is designed to provide general information about legal matters and related concepts. It should not be used as, or in substitute of, your own legal advice or other advice as appropriate.

To the extent allowed by law, no warranty, condition, or guarantee is provided in relation to the accuracy or reliability of any information contained on this site. Content may be changed from time to time without notice.

If you face a charge relating to manslaughter, contact Anderson Legal. This firm provides expert advice and representation for people needing assistance to defend themselves against unjust accusations.

For more information, read our Terms of Use

On-Demand Resources

View below the on-demand resources of this firm.

On-Demand Resources

View below the on-demand resources of this firm.
On-Demand Resources

On-Demand Resources

Responding to Unfair Written Warnings at WorkIn Australia, employers may issue a written warning to ensure procedural fairness. The failure to give employees a chance to fix underperformance or some misconduct can see successful unfair dismissal claims made against employers. An unfair written warning may afford no protection against an unfair dismissal claim.Viewdisciplinary-processes employment-lawwritten-warnings
Responding to a Workplace Investigation into Bullying ComplaintsFacing a workplace investigation into a workplace bullying complaint can leave people feeling stressed, uncertain and isolated. Getting informed about how you may respond to a workplace bullying complaint, as well as your rights, responsibilities and options is essential for anybody facing an issue of this kind.Viewemployment-lawworkplace-bullying workplace-investigations
Responding to a Show Cause LetterA show cause letter is meant to provide an employee with an opportunity to explain (show cause) why they should not face disciplinary action within the workplace. The failure to give employees a chance to 'show cause' why the disciplinary action is unjustified can see decisions overturned or compensation awarded.Viewdisciplinary-processes employment-lawshow-cause-letters
Responding to a Workplace Investigation into Sexual HarassmentSexual harassment complaints often result in formal workplace investigations. Generally, Australian laws define sexual harassment as involving (1) unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature; (2) the conduct leaves the person feeling offended, humiliated or intimidated; and, (3) the reaction of the person is reasonable in the circumstances.Viewemployment-lawsexual-harassment workplace-investigations
Responding to False Bullying Allegations at WorkMany people who face bullying complaints at work are managers in one form or another. However described, executives, managers, or small business owners all have as part of their role the task of managing the conduct and performance of others. It is not uncommon for performance management issues to lead to allegations of bullying.Viewemployment-law workplace-bullyingfalse-allegations
Responding to False Sexual Harassment Allegations at WorkAnybody who believes they are subject to false or wrongful sexual harassment allegations should get urgent legal advice due to the potential consequences of such claims. Employers may be vicariously liable for sexual harassment that occurs in a workplace unless they have taken "all reasonable steps" to prevent it.Viewemployment-law sexual-harassmentfalse-allegations

Free Consultation

Free Consultation

Free Consultation

Can We Help?

It costs nothing but time to see if we are the right firm for you case. Contact us to see if this firm can assist you.

This firm offers a ‘free consultation’. The reason is simple – it shouldn’t cost anything for a person to pick up the phone and understand if a particular law firm can help them or not. Anderson Legal takes the time necessary to understand the issues and to determine if we are in a real position to provide the standard of advice and representation you are entitled to expect.

Our Clients

Our clients make our practice. They are the ones we worry about each day, and to whom we owe a great obligation.

Our clients often have sought out Anderson Legal because they have been told something about expertise and experience. They put their faith and trust in the work of this firm. Professional reputation follows reality and not the other way around. Andrew Anderson, Legal Director, offers our clients a proven track record of success in complex and difficult cases across all court levels, including multiple appeals before the High Court of Australia.

Our Focus

Justice is best served by lawyers who are focused on their clients and not their competitors. The primary interest of this law firm is justice in the interests of its clients. Whilst we provide premium services at highly competitive rates, it is not about undercutting our competitors. It is simply a function of our real focus – you.

Cost Comparisons

Comparing lawyers is not just a question of price, but value. Backed by the experience of successful courtroom advocacy across Australia, this firm offers significant value to its clients beyond price.
It is notoriously difficult to compare lawyers. Past courtroom experience and outcomes achieved do provide some basis for comparison. Andrew Anderson has an enviable record of success in contested hearings, trials and appeals.

You may find other principal lawyers charge 50% (or more) above the hourly rates of the principal lawyer of this firm, but that may not be the most important measure of value. When you face a legal issue, particularly a complex one, there are other issues to consider.

As a lawyer who has achieved significant outcomes in a variety of contexts – as a Principal Crown Prosecutor, as a barrister, and as a law firm principal – Andrew Anderson brings a different level of experience to his advice and representation as compared to most solicitors. While he routinely works with leading Queens Counsel and other specialist barristers in complex cases, his significant experience in litigating and resolving disputes in cases throughout Australia means his clients have genuine expertise available from the start.

This firm may use several fee options, either exclusively or at various stages. The purpose is to make legal fees predictable, understandable, and transparent. Options include ‘fixed fee’ agreements, ‘capped’ legal costs, and agreements where the costs are calculated on a ‘pay as you go’ basis.

Entering into costs agreements that are understandable, and transparent allows this firm to remain focused on the outcomes our clients seek.

Our Referrals

If, unfortunately, we cannot provide you advice or representation, we will probably know who can.

The areas of law this practice handles are deliberately narrow and deep. Our deep focus on select areas of law allows this firm to handle some of the most complex and challenging cases that come before the courts.

It is not uncommon for this firm to receive enquiries we know will be better handled by others. In the interests of maintaining the highest standards, there are also occasions when cases we would otherwise welcome are declined to focus on existing clients’ needs. In such instances, we will try to identify who may be in a position to assist you.