Murder Charges - Queensland

Murder

Sections 300 and 302 Criminal Code (Qld)

Get informed about the law, defences, and penalties in Queensland

Murder is the most serious criminal offence in Queensland. In Queensland, punishment for murder carries mandatory life imprisonment with a current minimum non-parole period of 20 years imprisonment. The minimum non-parole period may be higher in some cases, such as for particularly heinous crimes and where multiple deaths are involved.

Legal Disclaimer

Page Contents


Murder Charges

Anderson Legal defends individuals facing criminal allegations relating to violent offences and misconduct.


On-Demand Resources

View our growing library of articles and webinars, which are accessible no matter the time of day or night.


Free Consultation

Anderson Legal provides a free, no-obligation consultation to understand whether this firm can assist you.


Murder Charges

Anderson Legal defends individuals facing criminal allegations relating to violent offences and misconduct.

On-Demand Resources

View our growing library of articles and webinars, which are accessible no matter the time of day or night.

Free Consultation

Anderson Legal provides a free, no-obligation consultation to understand whether this firm can assist you.

Murder Charges

Before you can properly defend yourself against an allegation of any kind, you need to understand it.
This section deals with the following:
Criminal Defence Image

Murder Charges

Before you can properly defend yourself against an allegation of any kind, you need to understand it.
This section deals with the following:
Criminal Defence Image

Queensland Law

Section 300 Criminal Code (Qld)

Section 300 of the Criminal Code makes unlawful killing an offence in Queensland. The law states:

Any person who unlawfully kills another is guilty of a crime, which is called murder or manslaughter, according to the circumstances of the case.

From this section of the Criminal Code, definitions are then given for ‘murder’ and ‘manslaughter’.

Definition of Murder

Section 302 of the Criminal Code (Qld) sets out the definition of murder. It states:

302 Definition of murder

(1) Except as hereinafter set forth, a person who unlawfully kills another under any of the following circumstances, that is to say—

(a) if the offender intends to cause the death of the person killed or that of some other person or if the offender intends to do to the person killed or to some other person some grievous bodily harm;

(aa) if death is caused by an act done, or omission made, with reckless indifference to human life;

(b) if death is caused by means of an act done in the prosecution of an unlawful purpose, which act is of such a nature as to be likely to endanger human life;

(c) if the offender intends to do grievous bodily harm to some person for the purpose of facilitating the commission of a crime which is such that the offender may be arrested without warrant, or for the purpose of facilitating the flight of an offender who has committed or attempted to commit any such crime;

(d) if death is caused by administering any stupefying or overpowering thing for either of the purposes mentioned in paragraph (c);

(e) if death is caused by wilfully stopping the breath of any person for either of such purposes;

is guilty of murder.

(2) Under subsection (1)(a) it is immaterial that the offender did not intend to hurt the particular person who is killed.

(3) Under subsection (1)(b) it is immaterial that the offender did not intend to hurt any person.

(4) Under subsection (1)(c) to (e) it is immaterial that the offender did not intend to cause death or did not know that death was likely to result.

(5) An indictment charging an offence against this section with the circumstance of aggravation stated in the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992, section 161Q may not be presented without the consent of a Crown Law Officer.

Section 161Q of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 refers to the ‘serious organised crime circumstance of aggravation’, which mandates a significant mandatory minimum imprisonment in addition to any other penalty. It targets people who commit an offence of murder in association with being a criminal organisation participant.

Proof of Murder

For every criminal charge in Queensland, there are ‘elements’ that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Failure to prove just one element means the person charged must be found not guilty. Sometimes there will be an alternative offence that a person may then be found guilty of instead if proof of the primary charge fails.

There are different ways elements may be expressed, depending on the issues in a given case. Given the multiple definitions of what constitutes murder in Queensland, different elements will apply depending on how the prosecution attempts to prove its case.

In cases where multiple defendants are charged, Queensland law makes it possible for more than one person to be found guilty for the commission of an offence. For instance, a person may be found guilty if they aided or encouraged another person to do the act that causes death.

In reviewing an individual case, a criminal lawyer’s work often begins with a careful analysis of the evidence to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the prosecution case and, in particular, its ability to prove each element of the offence.

Intention: Murder under section 302(1)(a) Criminal Code (Qld)

Proof of murder under section 302(1)(a) of the Criminal Code requires proof of the following:

  1. The deceased alleged to be killed is dead;
  2. The person charged caused the death;
  3. The person charged did so unlawfully;
  4. At the time of doing the act or making the omission that caused the death, the person charged intended to kill or do grievous bodily harm to the deceased or some other person.

It is important to observe that the intention to cause the specific result (death or grievous bodily harm) does not need to relate to the person actually killed. An innocent bystander, for instance, may be killed by a bullet intended to kill somebody else. In such circumstances, the elements would still be made out given death resulted to “some other person” in those circumstances.

The above elements make clear that in order for a person to be found guilty of murder under section 302(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, it is sufficient to prove an intention to cause grievous bodily harm. The definition of ‘grievous bodily harm’ is set out in section 1 of the Criminal Code:

“grievous bodily harm” means—

(a) the loss of a distinct part or an organ of the body; or

(b) serious disfigurement; or

(c) any bodily injury of such a nature that, if left untreated, would endanger or be likely to endanger life, or cause or be likely to cause permanent injury to health;

whether or not treatment is or could have been available.

Reckless Indifference: Murder under section 302(1)(aa) Criminal Code (Qld)

The definition of murder was significantly expanded in Queensland by the introduction of section 302(1)(aa), which was introduced in 2019 as part of the Criminal Code and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2019 (Qld). The Explanatory Notes of the law explain the purpose of the law is to widen the scope of murder offences in Queensland:

Including recklessness as an element of murder in section 302 of the Criminal Code will capture a wider range of offending as murder in Queensland. Reckless murder exists in a number of other Australian jurisdictions reflecting that intention and foresight of probable consequences are morally equivalent – that is a person who foresees the probability of death is just as blameworthy as the person who intends to kill. This change, depending on the circumstances of the particular case, will apply across the board to not just include recklessness in relation to the deaths of children but will be applicable to any person, including other categories of vulnerable persons such as the disabled and the elderly.

In essence, the offence of murder in Queensland now captures acts or omissions that formerly were likely to be bound up with the offence of manslaughter. The change means that instead of facing the discretionary penalty that applies in cases of manslaughter, a person convicted under the definition in section 302(1)(aa) now faces a minimum non-parole period of 20 years imprisonment.

In order for a person to be found guilty of murder by reckless indifference, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person charged knew death would be a probable consequence of their acts or omissions but nevertheless carried on regardless of the probability of death resulting. While this mode of proof for murder is relatively new in Queensland, it has a long history in other parts of Australia, including New South Wales. In Pemble v The Queen [1971] HCA 20, a decision of the High Court of Australia that considered ‘reckless indifference’, the essential difference between murder by reckless indifference and manslaughter was explained by Justice Menzies:

The use of the words “recklessness” or “reckless indifference” of itself would not bring home to the jury that it is only a recklessness that involves actual foresight of the probability of causing death or grievous bodily harm and indifference to that risk which does constitute the mental element that must be found to support a conviction for murder. The difference between murder and manslaughter is not to be found in the degree of carelessness exhibited; the critical difference relates to the state of mind with which the fatal act is done.

The above quotation signifies that it is the actual state of mind of the person charged that is in issue. That is, proof of the offence requires the defendant to have actually known death would probably result from his or her actions yet carried on regardless of that realisation. This ‘state of mind’ is the murderous element that differentiates the charge from manslaughter.

Unlawful Purpose: Murder under section 302(1)(b) Criminal Code (Qld)

Proof of murder under section 302(1)(b) of the Criminal Code (Qld) (sometimes referred to as a ‘felony murder’) requires the prosecution to prove a death was caused through an act done in the prosecution of an unlawful purpose, which act is of such a nature as to be likely to endanger human life.” This provision has not always been simple to apply, as the High Court of Australia held in Hughes v The Queen [1951] HCA 34 that the act likely to endanger human life is distinct from the unlawful purpose. What this means is that if, as in the case of Hughes v The Queen [1951] HCA 34, if the dangerous act causing death is a violent assault, but the accused had no purpose other than to assault the deceased, then there is no relevant distinction and section 302(1)(b) could not apply. The case of Stuart v The Queen [1974] HCA 54, again a decision of the High Court of Australia, is an example of when it can apply. The case against the accused there was that lighting a fire in a nightclub filled with people was likely to endanger life. The dangerous act was done in the prosecution of the unlawful purpose of extortion.

Facilitating Crimes: Murder under section 302(1)(c) Criminal Code (Qld)

Section 302(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Qld) is not commonly resorted to as a mode of proof in the prosecution of murder charges in Queensland, which may be due to the degree of overlap with other means of proving the charge of murder. The potential overlap may be seen in the discussion by the Queensland Court of Appeal in R v Georgiou & Ors [2002] QCA 206, in which it was stated in relation to a felony murder under section 302(1)(b):

It is, however, important to recognise that the section speaks of “unlawful purpose” and not “offence”. The unlawful purpose is therefore not limited to the strict elements of an offence. Any act done in the course of attempting to get away after the commission of an offence would be an act done for an unlawful purpose. In particular cases a question may arise as to when the “unlawful purpose” associated with the commission of an offence had ended, but such an issue does not arise here. The killing occurred very shortly after the breaking and entering of the chemist shop, on the street outside the shop, before the burglars had left the scene, and with a view of avoiding apprehension for the offence.

As the above passage indicates, an act done for the purpose of facilitating flight from a crime scene may fall under section 302(1)(b), even though it may also fall under section 302(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Qld). Proof of murder under section 302(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Qld) requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the following:

  1. The deceased alleged to be killed is dead; and,
  2. The person charged caused the death; and,
  3. The person charged did so unlawfully; and,
  4. The person charged intended to do grievous bodily harm to some person; and,
  5. The act was done for the purpose of facilitating the commission of a crime for which he or she may be arrested without warrant; or,
  6. The act was done for the purpose of facilitating the flight of someone who has committed or attempted to commit any such crime.

While offences may specify whether a suspected offender may be arrested with or without warrant, section 5 of the Criminal Code (Qld) defines the meaning of the term ‘the offender may be arrested without warrant’.


Possible Defences

The ‘presumption of innocence’

When people think about a ‘defence’ to a charge, such as murder, they are generally thinking about what makes them ‘not guilty’ of the offence. However, it is for the prosecution to prove they are guilty – and to do so beyond a reasonable doubt. The presumption of innocence means that the defendant carries no onus of proof. What that means in practical terms is that it is for the prosecution to disprove any defences raised on the evidence.

For a charge of murder, the prosecution must prove the elements of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. However, it must also exclude all defences that may apply beyond reasonable doubt. Of course, a defendant may give or call evidence that points to their innocence. The decision to give or call evidence does not shift the onus of proof away from the prosecution.

How are defences raised on the evidence?

A defence may be raised on the evidence of both the prosecution and the defence. That is, people who give witness statements to police may indicate that an event occurred accidentally, or a person appeared to act in self-defence. Generally speaking, the prosecution has an obligation to call all material witnesses at a trial – even those unfavourable to its case. Alternatively, a person charged with an offence may also call their own witnesses at a trial, which may provide the basis for a defence to be raised.

One of the important roles of a criminal lawyer is to identify, as early as possible, the relevant defences that may apply in a given case. The reason it is important to do it as early as possible is to ensure relevant witnesses are found while matters are freshest in their mind, or to prevent other evidence from being lost or destroyed.

Common defences for ‘murder’

The law requires the prosecution to prove that the murder was caused ‘unlawfully’. That means if the prosecution cannot disprove the act or omission was authorised, justified or excused by law, the person charged must be found not guilty. In Queensland, possible defences include:

  • Accident
  • Defence of another
  • Extraordinary emergency
  • Insanity
  • Mistake of fact
  • Killing on provocation
  • Self defence
  • Unwilled act

The charge of murder carries specific, partial defences that do not apply to other offences. The defences of diminished responsibility under section 304A of the Criminal Code (Qld), as well as killing for preservation in an abusive domestic relationship under section 304B of the Criminal Code (Qld) may apply in cases of murder but only reduce culpability to manslaughter. That is, those defences reduce the charge from murder to manslaughter but do not, unlike other defences, remove criminal responsibility completely.

Amongst the most important advice a lawyer can provide is whether or not a defence applies to an individual case. In some cases, multiple defences may apply. In others, no defence may be considered viable. Certain defences cannot operate together. For this reason, anybody facing a charge of murder should seek early, authoritative advice from an experienced criminal lawyer to understand their legal position.

Excluded defences for ‘murder’

In Queensland, the same defences do not apply to every offence. Certain defences are qualified or excluded for charges of murder. For instance, in R v Fitzgerald [1999] QCA 109, it was explained that the defence of ‘unwilled act’ under section 23(1)(a) or ‘accident’ under section 23(1)(b) may not apply depending on the mode of proof chosen for the charge of murder.

Another example of a defence being excluded or qualified is the defence of killing on provocation under section 304 of the Criminal Code (Qld). More recently, it is a defence that has been significantly qualified to reduce its applicability in cases of murder.


Possible Penalties

Maximum Penalty

The maximum penalty for murder in Queensland is life imprisonment or an indefinite sentence.

Minimum Penalty

While many offences under Queensland law do not carry mandatory minimum sentences, murder does. The penalties are set out in section 305 of the Criminal Code (Qld), although it is necessary also, in some cases, to refer to section 181 of the Corrective Services Act (Qld). The following minimum penalties apply

  • A minimum non-parole period of 30 years imprisonment applies in the following circumstances:
    • The person is being sentenced on more than one conviction of murder; or
    • The person is being sentenced on one conviction of murder, and another offence of murder is taken into account; or
    • The person is being sentenced for one conviction of murder, and the person has been sentenced for another offence of murder on a previous occasion.
  • A minimum non-parole period of 25 years imprisonment applies if the person killed was a police officer, and the murder occurred:
    • when the police officer was performing his or her duties, and the offender knew, or ought reasonably to have known he or she was a police officer; or
    • because the police officer was a police officer; or
    • because of, or in retaliation for, the actions of the police officer or another police officer in the performance of the officer’s duty.
  • A minimum non-parole period of 20 years imprisonment for an offence of murder committed on or after 29 August 2012 (due to the change in maximum penalty due to the Criminal Law Amendment Act 2012 (Qld)).
  • A minimum non-parole period of 15 years imprisonment for an offence of murder committed before 29 August 2012.
  • When a person is convicted of committing the offence and the serious organised crime circumstance of aggravation applies, 7 years imprisonment is automatically imposed cumulatively on the sentence the court decides. The 7 years imprisonment must be served wholly in prison, on top of whatever other penalty is otherwise required to be served.

The minimum penalty for murder reflects the seriousness of the offence, which was highlighted by the President of the Queensland Court of Appeal in R v Appleton [2017] QCA 290 at paragraph [27]:

Murder is a particularly evil act because its effects are not limited to the extinguishment of a life that might have been longer. It also has an ongoing effect upon the victim’s close ones. That effect is not limited to mere bereavement. As in this case, such people must also lament the cruel facts about how their loved one was killed.

Sentencing in Queensland

For a charge of murder, the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) sets out a range of relevant sentencing considerations, including that the principle that imprisonment should be imposed as a last resort does not apply. For a homicide offence like murder, the law states that the court must have primary regard to the following considerations:

  • the risk of physical harm to any members of the community if a custodial sentence were not imposed;
  • the need to protect any members of the community from that risk;
  • the personal circumstances of any victim of the offence;
  • the circumstances of the offence, including the death of or any injury to a member of the public or any loss or damage resulting from the offence;
  • the nature or extent of the violence used, or intended to be used, in the commission of the offence;
  • any disregard by the offender for the interests of public safety;
  • the past record of the offender, including any attempted rehabilitation and the number of previous offences of any type committed;
  • the antecedents, age and character of the offender;
  • any remorse or lack of remorse of the offender;
  • any medical, psychiatric, prison or other relevant report in relation to the offender;
  • anything else about the safety of members of the community that the sentencing court considers relevant.

If the offence is classified as a ‘domestic violence offence’, then the court will treat that as an aggravating factor unless exceptional circumstances are shown. Due to the number of issues that can aggravate or mitigate the punishment imposed by a court, experience shows that the earlier a person facing a charge obtains sound advice from an experienced lawyer, the better their chance of securing the best outcome possible for their situation.

Possible Outcomes

The offence of murder has relatively prescribed penalties, leaving little discretion for courts. However, courts have a discretion to sentence a person convicted of murder beyond the minimum penalty prescribed under the law. So much was confirmed in R v Appleton [2017] QCA 290 , a case in which a minimum sentence of 23 years imprisonment was imposed before eligibility for parole. It was stated:

In cases of murder, the element of denunciation is usually fully served by the imposition of a mandatory term of imprisonment for life with a minimum parole eligibility date of 20 years. However, cases may arise when more is required and s 160C(5) of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 can serve that purpose.

As such, while murder charges have a fairly well-defined mandatory set of penalties in Queensland, courts may increase the minimum amount of time to be served for instances of the offence that warrant particular denunciation.

In some cases, a charge relating to murder may be substituted for, or charged in addition to, other homicide offences. The prosecution may determine that a more or less serious charge may be appropriate, based on the evidence. Related crimes include:


Expert Criminal Defence

Although based in Brisbane, Anderson Legal is frequently engaged to defend people facing criminal allegations across Queensland. If you are dealing with an allegation relating to murder and need advice and representation, Anderson Legal offers comprehensive criminal defence services for its clients. This includes:

  • providing advice relating to allegations made or documents served on our clients;
  • identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the case alleged against our clients;
  • advising clients on options relating to obtaining evidence, including expert evidence;
  • communicating on behalf of its clients with police, courts, and others;
  • resolving, where appropriate, criminal charges through negotiation;
  • representing clients in trials and setnences before all courts; and,
  • filing and litigating appeals against wrongful convictions and unjust sentences.

This firm places an emphasis on providing clear guidance so that our clients are placed in a real position to make informed decisions about their options and their preferred path forward. Anderson Legal provides clear, transparent disclosure of its legal costs at every stage.

  • Andrew Anderson, Legal Director, is an award-winning lawyer who has been independently described by the Courier Mail as “one of the best legal minds” and a “leading corporate and white-collar crime lawyer” (16 December 2021).
  • Having successfully represented litigants in the High Court of Australia, Queensland Court of Appeal, Royal Commissions, and multiple other courts dealing with trials and other hearings, Andrew Anderson has a demonstrated record of success in complex and difficult cases.
  • Prior to operating a law firm, Andrew Anderson worked as a Principal Crown Prosecutor in Queensland and barrister in private practice at 8 Petrie Terrace Chambers in Brisbane. His depth of courtroom advocacy experience ranges from straightforward cases right through to complex homicide trials and appeals.
  • Anderson Legal is a law firm that is dedicated to the best ideals of the legal profession. Seeking to exceed client expectations and fighting for justice is an everyday pursuit.

Limitations on general information

Each legal issue is unique. The information on this page and website cannot – and is not meant to – substitute legal consultation. It is designed to outline information of a general nature if you want to learn more about murder charges, particularly as it relates to anybody facing an issue of this kind in Queensland. Anybody dealing with a murder charge ought to obtain expert legal advice and guidance as soon as possible.

No content accessible on the website is created to provide specific legal answers or advice. It is designed to provide general information about legal matters and related concepts. It should not be used as, or in substitute of, your own legal advice or other advice as appropriate.

To the extent allowed by law, no warranty, condition, or guarantee is provided in relation to the accuracy or reliability of any information contained on this site. Content may be changed from time to time without notice.

If you face a charge relating to murder, contact Anderson Legal. This firm provides expert advice and representation for people needing assistance to defend themselves against unjust accusations.

For more information, read our Terms of Use

On-Demand Resources

View below the on-demand resources of this firm.

On-Demand Resources

View below the on-demand resources of this firm.
On-Demand Resources

On-Demand Resources

ImageTitleOverviewcategories_hfiltertags_hfilter
Jury TrialsThe Jury Act 1995 (Qld) and Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) set out a range of important procedures relevant to jury trials in Queensland. Having an understanding of jury trial procedures can assist defendants, witnesses and others to know what may occur during a criminal trial.Viewcourt-processestrials-sentences
Sentencing HearingsIn Queensland, the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) sets out a range of sentencing guidelines, possible punishments and procedures relevant to sentencing hearings. Understanding the issues that are relevant to sentencing hearings and what influences outcomes is essential to avoiding unjust penalties and results.Viewcourt-processestrials-sentences
Evidence DisclosureIt is a fundamental to a fair trial that an accused person knows the particulars of the charge they face as well as the potential witnesses and evidence. Evidence disclosure is an essential part of the criminal justice system. Failure to disclose critical evidence can lead to miscarriages of justice, resulting in convictions being quashed.Viewcourt-processesevidence
Criminal AppealsA criminal appeal allows a person to appeal against their conviction or appeal against the severity of their sentence, in an attempt to overturn the result. Appeals often involve complex questions of law or fact. Unlike when the prosecution bears the onus of proof at trial, on appeal, the appellant must demonstrate error.Viewcourt-processescriminal-appeals
Police Seizure of EvidenceThe Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 (Qld) sets out the powers of police to retain, return, and forfeit property that is seized. Important rights exist for individuals and businesses to access seized property, as well as to seek its return through applications and court orders to lessen inconvenience and disruption.Viewpolice-investigationspolice-powers
Cooperating with PoliceSuspects in police investigations are often faced with a choice as to whether to cooperate with the police to any degree. Cooperation with law enforcement agencies can take many forms - it may be minimal and do little to assist the investigation or can involve extensive cooperation or ‘a deal’ that results in a significantly lighter sentence.Viewpolice-investigationscooperating-with-police
The Right to SilenceIn Queensland, the right to silence is recognised as important but it is not an absolute right. While often relevant to police suspects facing questioning, in some situations it can be an offence to not answer questions of a person in authority. In rare cases, unfavourable inferences may be drawn because a defendant remains silent.Viewpolice-investigationscooperating-with-police
WHSQ – Coercive PowersInspectors with Work Health and Safety Queensland (WHSQ) have powers that allow them to compel people to provide information and access to documents and other records, which they may seize. They may also compel people to answer their questions. Getting advice can be crucial to understanding your rights and obligations.Viewcoercive-investigations whswork-health-safety-queensland
CCC – Coercive PowersThe Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) is an independent agency in Queensland that has responsibility for combating major crime and corruption in Queensland. It has powers of surveillance, investigation and the use of coercive powers to gather intelligence, undertake investigations and manage enforcement proceedings.Viewcoercive-investigations corporate-crimecrime-corruption-commission
ASIC – Coercive PowersThe Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has coercive powers to compel the production of documents or other evidence relevant to an investigation. The powers are broad and non-compliance can have criminal consequences. Evidence obtained through such investigations may be used later in court proceedings.Viewcoercive-investigations corporate-crimeaustralian-securities-investments-commission
ACIC – Coercive PowersThe Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC), still also referred to as the Australian Crime Commission (ACC), conducts secretive operations and investigations into serious criminal activity. It has the power to compel individuals to participate in examinations and to serve notices to produce documents and other information.Viewcoercive-investigations corporate-crimeaustralian-criminal-intelligence-commission
Industrial ManslaughterIndustrial manslaughter is a relatively new criminal offence in Queensland, having commenced on 23 October 2017. It targets business operators and senior officers in corporations who, through negligence, cause the death of a worker the course of carrying out their work. The maximum penalty is up to 20 years imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offences whshomicide-offences penalties-prosecutions
Unlawful Striking Causing DeathIn Queensland, punishment for unlawful striking causing death carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Introduced to target the prevalence of 'coward punch' deaths, it removes what were common defences in cases where it is alleged the person killed was struck to the head or neck.Viewcriminal-offenceshomicide-offences
ManslaughterManslaughter may be proved in a number of ways, such as by criminal negligence or a deliberate act. An unlawful killing that does not meet the definition of murder may be deemed manslaughter. In Queensland, punishment for manslaughter carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offenceshomicide-offences
Proceeds of CrimeProceeds of crime offences exist to make it unlawful to receive or possess property that is tainted by crime. While proceeds of crime laws are often used in relation to drug offences, their reach under the Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002 (Qld) and Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) covers all types of serious criminal offences.Viewcriminal-offencesfraud-and-financial-crimes
FraudFraud is a serious criminal offence in Queensland, which may be punishable by actual imprisonment. The essential element of the charge is proof of 'dishonesty', which requires the prosecution to prove that what a defendant did was dishonest by the standards of ordinary honest people.Viewcriminal-offencesfraud-and-financial-crimes
ExtortionExtortion is a serious criminal offence, which may be punishable by actual imprisonment. While it is most commonly charged when threats of violence are used to blackmail a person to hand over property, other forms of coercion or intimidation can give rise to the offence of extortion in Queensland.Viewcriminal-offencesfraud-and-financial-crimes violent-offences
Centrelink FraudCentrelink fraud (sometimes referred to as 'Welfare Fraud' or 'Social Security Fraud') is regarded as a serious criminal offence in Australia, which is punishable by actual imprisonment. There are a number of different charges that may apply under the Commonwealth Criminal Code for cases of this kind.Viewcriminal-offencesfraud-and-financial-crimes
Drug Importation OffencesDrug importation offences under the Commonwealth Criminal Code can attract some of the highest penalties for drug offences in Australia, which generally reflects the commercial and coordinated efforts involved in such offences. The maximum penalty for importing a commercial quantity of border controlled drugs is life imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offencesdrug-offences
Possessing Dangerous DrugsFor a drug possession case in Queensland, the prosecution sets out to prove that (1) the person charged (2) unlawfully (4) possessed (5) a dangerous drug. Penalties vary considerably, from drug diversion orders in minor cases through to lengthy terms of imprisonment for serious cases of possessing dangerous drugs.Viewcriminal-offencesdrug-offences
Producing Dangerous DrugsProducing dangerous drugs is a serious criminal offence in Queensland. The definition of the word 'produce' in the Drugs Misuse Act (Qld) is extremely broad and allows individuals to be charged with producing a dangerous drug even though there may never be any dangerous drugs actually produced.Viewcriminal-offencesdrug-offences
Supplying Dangerous DrugsSupply dangerous drug charges a serious criminal offences in Queensland, which can be punishable by imprisonment. The definition of 'supply' in the Drugs Misuse Act (Qld) is extremely broad and allows individuals to be charged with supplying a dangerous drug even though there may never be a transaction or actual exchange of drugs.Viewcriminal-offencesdrug-offences
Drug TraffickingFor a drug trafficking case in Queensland, the prosecution sets out to prove that (1) the person charged (2) carried on the business of (3) unlawfully (4) trafficking in a (5) dangerous drug. In Queensland, the maximum penalty for carrying on the business of unlawful trafficking is 25 years' imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offencesdrug-offences
Attempted MurderFor an attempted murder case, the prosecution sets out to prove that the person charged unlawfully attacked or did something to another person with the intention of killing them, using means capable of doing so, but without death resulting. In Queensland, the maximum penalty for attempted murder is life imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offenceshomicide-offences violent-offences
Serious AssaultSerious assault is an offence in Queensland that is commonly charged when police officers are allegedly assaulted in the execution of their duties, the offence is also charged in other circumstances, such as in cases of assaults of elderly people or working corrective services officers.Viewcriminal-offencesviolent-offences
Grievous Bodily HarmIn Queensland, grievous bodily harm is an offence under section 320 of the Criminal Code 1899 (Qld). Suffering life threatening or permanent injuries are examples of grievous bodily harm. The offence is punishable by up to 14 years imprisonment and may be deemed a 'serious violent offence'.Viewcriminal-offencesviolent-offences
Common AssaultCommon assault is a criminal offence, which relates to the unlawful application of force, or threatened application of force in some circumstances, without consent. An assault is unlawful when it is not authorised, justified or excused. In Queensland, the offence of common assault has a maximum penalty of 3 years imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offencesviolent-offences
Unlawful WoundingUnlawful wounding is a serious criminal offence, often punishable by actual imprisonment. The word 'wounding' refers to a break of the true skin, often by a sharp object. A wound may be caused in any number of ways, such as by a knife or a bottle. The maximum penalty is 7 years imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offencesviolent-offences
Assault Occasioning Bodily HarmAssault occasioning bodily harm requires proof of an unlawful assault that caused bodily harm. The term 'bodily harm' refers to any bodily injury that interferes with health or comfort. The maximum penalty is 7 years' imprisonment, although if a circumstance of aggravation applies, it rises to a maximum of 10 years' imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offencesviolent-offences
Malicious Act With IntentMalicious act with intent is a serious criminal offence, generally punishable by actual imprisonment. In Queensland, it generally is charged in cases in which a serious injury has been caused by someone who intended to cause such a result. The maximum penalty for a charge of malicious act with intent is life imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offencesviolent-offences
MurderThere are multiple definitions of what constitutes murder in Queensland, including murder by intentional harm or through ‘reckless indifference’. In Queensland, punishment for murder carries mandatory life imprisonment with a current minimum non-parole period of at least 20 years imprisonment.Viewcriminal-offenceshomicide-offences

Free Consultation

Free Consultation

Free Consultation

Can We Help?

It costs nothing but time to see if we are the right firm for you case. Contact us to see if this firm can assist you.

This firm offers a ‘free consultation’. The reason is simple – it shouldn’t cost anything for a person to pick up the phone and understand if a particular law firm can help them or not. Anderson Legal takes the time necessary to understand the issues and to determine if we are in a real position to provide the standard of advice and representation you are entitled to expect.

Our Clients

Our clients make our practice. They are the ones we worry about each day, and to whom we owe a great obligation.

Our clients often have sought out Anderson Legal because they have been told something about expertise and experience. They put their faith and trust in the work of this firm. Professional reputation follows reality and not the other way around. Andrew Anderson, Legal Director, offers our clients a proven track record of success in complex and difficult cases across all court levels, including multiple appeals before the High Court of Australia.

Our Focus

Justice is best served by lawyers who are focused on their clients and not their competitors. The primary interest of this law firm is justice in the interests of its clients. Whilst we provide premium services at highly competitive rates, it is not about undercutting our competitors. It is simply a function of our real focus – you.

Cost Comparisons

Comparing lawyers is not just a question of price, but value. Backed by the experience of successful courtroom advocacy across Australia, this firm offers significant value to its clients beyond price.
It is notoriously difficult to compare lawyers. Past courtroom experience and outcomes achieved do provide some basis for comparison. Andrew Anderson has an enviable record of success in contested hearings, trials and appeals.

You may find other principal lawyers charge 50% (or more) above the hourly rates of the principal lawyer of this firm, but that may not be the most important measure of value. When you face a legal issue, particularly a complex one, there are other issues to consider.

As a lawyer who has achieved significant outcomes in a variety of contexts – as a Principal Crown Prosecutor, as a barrister, and as a law firm principal – Andrew Anderson brings a different level of experience to his advice and representation as compared to most solicitors. While he routinely works with leading Queens Counsel and other specialist barristers in complex cases, his significant experience in litigating and resolving disputes in cases throughout Australia means his clients have genuine expertise available from the start.

This firm may use several fee options, either exclusively or at various stages. The purpose is to make legal fees predictable, understandable, and transparent. Options include ‘fixed fee’ agreements, ‘capped’ legal costs, and agreements where the costs are calculated on a ‘pay as you go’ basis.

Entering into costs agreements that are understandable, and transparent allows this firm to remain focused on the outcomes our clients seek.

Our Referrals

If, unfortunately, we cannot provide you advice or representation, we will probably know who can.

The areas of law this practice handles are deliberately narrow and deep. Our deep focus on select areas of law allows this firm to handle some of the most complex and challenging cases that come before the courts.

It is not uncommon for this firm to receive enquiries we know will be better handled by others. In the interests of maintaining the highest standards, there are also occasions when cases we would otherwise welcome are declined to focus on existing clients’ needs. In such instances, we will try to identify who may be in a position to assist you.